Compass highlights practices, not people. It blends verified reports and documents to place evaluators on transparent tiers.
← Compass How Compass Ratings Work
First listed: Aug 17, 2025 • Last review: Aug 17, 2025
Why: Aligns burden and oversight with documented risk; publishes criteria; honors second opinions.
Maintain: Keep criteria public; provide right-of-reply for corrections.
First listed: Aug 17, 2025 • Last review: Aug 17, 2025
Why: Balanced approach when milestones are objective and transparent.
Improve: Shorten default durations; publish example milestones.
First listed: Aug 17, 2025 • Last review: Aug 17, 2025
Why: Pattern signals present but limited corroboration; right-of-reply in progress.
What helps: Additional documents and independent submitter reports.
First listed: Aug 17, 2025 • Last review: Aug 17, 2025
Why: Conflicts, non-confirmatory testing, or extended surveillance without evidence.
What would change this: Published criteria tied to risk, and transparent policy firewalls.
We verify patterns—not individual claims—and publish anonymously. Share positive or negative experiences. No PHI, please.
We rate practices, not people. Our 36-month window focuses on recent, verifiable behavior. Providers receive notice and a right of reply before publication or tier changes.
Submitters must verify identity to P4HR (kept private). We redact names/PHI and standardize submissions before review.
We compute a simple score from verified inputs. Positive practices can offset points.
Compass tiers:
Legal note: This directory is a good-faith consumer resource. It is not medical or legal advice and should not be used to harass or defame any individual. See our Terms for submissions and verification policies.